Intervention Summary
A Woman's Path to Recovery (Based on A Woman's Addiction Workbook)
        A Woman's Path to Recovery is a clinician-led program for women with substance use disorders. The model uses chapters from "A Woman's Addiction Workbook: Your Guide to In-Depth Healing" as the basis for 12 90-minute sessions conducted by clinicians over 8 weeks. The workbook is divided into two main sections: exploration and healing. The "exploration" section helps women look at their lives in relation to gender and addiction issues. It provides background information on the relationship between gender and addiction, differences between women and men in addiction and recovery, historical barriers to treatment faced by women, and subgroups of women at risk for addiction. It then encourages women to identify their life themes in five key areas relevant to women and addiction: body and sexuality, stress, relationships, trauma and violence, and thrill-seeking. They can also evaluate their addiction and co-occurring mental disorders. The "healing" section of the book guides women through methods of recovery. It is organized into four domains--relationships, beliefs, actions, and feelings--and includes a series of exercises for each domain. The book conveys a supportive tone for the journey to healing and provides specific recovery resources. Overall, the model addresses social and emotional problems unique to women. Difficult areas in a woman's life are explored through the psychology that underlies female addictive behavior. 
 The research to date on A Woman's Path to Recovery has been conducted with women addicted to opiates and other substances; however, the intervention can also be used to address nonsubstance addictions, such as addiction to shopping and eating. In addition, session length and program duration can be modified, depending on the setting or group of women. The workbook was originally created as a self-help model for women and adolescent girls and can be used in a self-help format (i.e., without the involvement of a clinician). This self-help model was not reviewed by NREPP. 
                            The documents below were reviewed for Quality of Research. The research point of
                            contact can provide information regarding the studies reviewed and the availability
                            of additional materials, including those from more recent studies that may have been conducted. Najavits, L. M., Rosier, M., Nolan, A. L., & Freeman, M. C. A new gender-based model for women's recovery from substance abuse: Results of a pilot outcome study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33(1), 5-11.   Client handouts Eisen, S. V., Wilcox, M., Leff, H. S., Schaefer, E., & Culhane, M. A. Assessing behavioral health outcomes in outpatient programs: Reliability and validity of the BASIS-32. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 26(1), 5-17.   Najavits, L. M.. A Woman's Path to Recovery Adherence Scale. Unpublished manuscript. Najavits, L. M.. A Woman's Path to Recovery Adherence Scale score sheet. Unpublished manuscript. Najavits, L. M. Women and addiction: The untold story [training outline]. Unpublished manuscript. Quality Assurance Protocol--A Woman's Addiction Workbook (aka A Woman's Path to Recovery When Clinician-Led)   
                            The following populations were identified in the studies reviewed for Quality of
                            Research. 
                            External reviewers independently evaluate the Quality of Research for an intervention's
                            reported results using six criteria: 
                            For more information about these criteria and the meaning of the ratings, see Quality of Research.
                         The study verified substance use through urine screens, used good additional measures, and had good fidelity outcomes. The encouraging results from this small pilot study could be the basis for a larger clinical trial. This was a small, preliminary pilot study. The offer of expedited admission to a methadone maintenance treatment program for volunteer participants may have introduced a sampling bias. Reliability and validity were not established for the outcome on knowledge of workbook concepts. The very small sample size and lack of a control or comparison group are major threats to validity (i.e., one cannot verify that the outcomes resulted from the intervention). The study had no follow-up data. 
                                The materials below were reviewed for Readiness for Dissemination. The implementation
                                point of contact can provide information regarding implementation of the intervention
                                and the availability of additional, updated, or new materials. Najavits, L. M. A woman's addiction workbook: Your guide to in-depth healing. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications. Najavits, L. M.. A Woman's Path to Recovery Adherence Scale. Unpublished manuscript. Najavits, L. M.. A Woman's Path to Recovery Adherence Scale score sheet. Unpublished manuscript. Najavits, L. M. Women and addiction: The untold story [training outline]. Unpublished manuscript. Quality Assurance Protocol--A Woman's Addiction Workbook (aka A Woman's Path to Recovery When Clinician-Led) Training handouts 
                                    External reviewers independently evaluate the intervention's Readiness for Dissemination
                                    using three criteria: For more information about these criteria and the meaning of the ratings, see Readiness for Dissemination.
                                 The program workbook is very well written. One-day training is available to interested implementers. An adherence scale provides a foundation for a fidelity assessment and reporting system. A detailed implementation protocol is not provided. Although the program is described as a simple model that could be implemented by anyone qualified to work in a treatment program, the materials and adherence standards use concepts and language that suggest a more advanced level of clinical training may be needed. No information is provided on the selection, preparation, and monitoring of adherence evaluators. It is not clear how data derived from the adherence scale are summarized, to whom the data are reported, or how the data are used to improve program delivery. 
                The cost information below was provided by the developer. Although this cost information
                may have been updated by the developer since the time of review, it may not reflect
                the current costs or availability of items (including newly developed or discontinued
                items). The implementation point of contact can provide current information and
                discuss implementation requirements. Descriptive Information
        
    
             
        
                Areas of Interest
             
            
                Substance use disorder treatment
             
        
             
        
                Outcomes
             
            
                  
        
1: Substance use
2: Global clinical improvement
3: Impulsive and addictive behavior
4: Knowledge of workbook concepts
            
             
        
                Outcome Categories
             
            
                Alcohol 
        
Drugs
Mental health
Quality of life
Social functioning
            
             
        
                Ages
             
            
                26-55 (Adult)
             
        
             
        
                Genders
             
            
                Female
             
        
             
        
                Races/Ethnicities
             
            
                Hispanic or Latino 
        
White
            
             
        
                Settings
             
            
                Outpatient
             
        
             
        
                Geographic Locations
             
            
                Urban
             
        
             
        
                Implementation History
             
            
                "A Woman's Addiction Workbook: Your Guide to In-Depth Healing" was published.
             
        
             
        
                NIH Funding/CER Studies
             
            
                Partially/fully funded by National Institutes of Health: No 
        
Evaluated in comparative effectiveness research studies: No
            
             
        
                Adaptations
             
            
                Parts of the workbook are being translated into French.
             
        
             
        
                Adverse Effects
             
            
                No adverse effects, concerns, or unintended consequences were identified by the developer.
             
        
             
    
                IOM Prevention Categories
             
            
                IOM prevention categories are not applicable.
             
        
    
    
     
    
     
    
              
        
                 
              
                  
                   
                      Documents Reviewed
                        Study 1
Supplementary Materials 
Outcomes
                       
                                    
                                
                                         
                                    Outcome 1: Substance use 
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Description of Measures
                                         
                                        
                                            Substance use was measured using the drug composite score from the Addiction Severity Index (ASI)--Lite. The ASI-Lite is a shortened version of the ASI, a semi-structured interview instrument that evaluates the severity of psychosocial problems across seven life domains: drug, alcohol, medical, employment, family/social, legal, and psychiatric. Composite scores of 0 to 1 are generated for each domain, with higher scores reflecting greater problem severity. Random urinalysis was used approximately weekly to verify self-reported drug use.
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Key Findings
                                         
                                        
                                            Participants in the workbook-based, group session program showed significant decreases in self-reported substance use from pretreatment (intake) to posttreatment (2 months after intake) (p < .005).
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Studies Measuring Outcome
                                         
                                        
                                            Study 1
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Study Designs
                                         
                                        
                                            Preexperimental
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                
                                            Quality of Research Rating
                                         
                                        
                                            2.6
                                            (0.0-4.0 scale)
                                         
                                    
                                    
                                
                                         
                                    Outcome 2: Global clinical improvement 
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Description of Measures
                                         
                                        
                                            Global clinical improvement was measured using the patient version of the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGIS). Using this tool, patients complete the statement "Compared with how I felt before beginning this study, I am now" with one of these phrases: (1) "very much improved," (2) "much improved," (3) "minimally improved," (4) "unchanged," (5) "minimally worse," (6) "much worse," or (7) "very much worse."
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Key Findings
                                         
                                        
                                            Participants in the workbook-based, group session program reported significant global clinical improvement from midtreatment (1 month after intake) to posttreatment (2 months after intake) (p < .005).
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Studies Measuring Outcome
                                         
                                        
                                            Study 1
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Study Designs
                                         
                                        
                                            Preexperimental
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                
                                            Quality of Research Rating
                                         
                                        
                                            2.4
                                            (0.0-4.0 scale)
                                         
                                    
                                    
                                
                                         
                                    Outcome 3: Impulsive and addictive behavior 
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Description of Measures
                                         
                                        
                                            Impulsive and addictive behavior was evaluated using the Impulsive and Addictive subscale of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32). The BASIS-32 measures self-reported symptom and problem difficulty across five functional domains: Relation to Self and Others, Depression and Anxiety, Daily Living and Role Functioning, Impulsive and Addictive Behavior, and Psychosis.
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Key Findings
                                         
                                        
                                            Participants in the workbook-based, group session program showed significant decreases in self-reported impulsive and addictive behavior from pretreatment (intake) to posttreatment (2 months after intake) (p < .05).
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Studies Measuring Outcome
                                         
                                        
                                            Study 1
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Study Designs
                                         
                                        
                                            Preexperimental
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                
                                            Quality of Research Rating
                                         
                                        
                                            2.3
                                            (0.0-4.0 scale)
                                         
                                    
                                    
                        
                                         
                                    Outcome 4: Knowledge of workbook concepts 
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Description of Measures
                                         
                                        
                                            Knowledge of workbook concepts was measured using two "quizzes"--an 18-item multiple-choice quiz and a 10-item true/false quiz--offered in the appendix of A Woman's Addiction Workbook.
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Key Findings
                                         
                                        
                                            Participants in the workbook-based, group session program showed significantly improved knowledge of workbook concepts from pretreatment (intake) to posttreatment (2 months after intake) (p < .005 for multiple-choice quiz, p < .05 for true/false quiz).
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Studies Measuring Outcome
                                         
                                        
                                            Study 1
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            Study Designs
                                         
                                        
                                            Preexperimental
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                
                                            Quality of Research Rating
                                         
                                        
                                            1.8
                                            (0.0-4.0 scale)
                                         
                                    Study Populations
                        
                                
                        
                                     
                                        
                                        Study
                                     
                                    
                                        Age
                                     
                                    
                                        Gender
                                     
                                    
                                        Race/Ethnicity
                                     
                                
                                             
                            
                                                
                                                    Study 1
                                                
                                             
                                            
                                                26-55 (Adult)
                                             
                                            
                                                100% Female
                                             
                                            
                                                87.5% White 
                                        
12.5% Hispanic or Latino
                                            
                            Quality of Research Ratings by Criteria (0.0-4.0 scale)
                        
                                    
                            
                        
                                 
                                    
                                    Outcome
                                 
                                
                                    Reliability 
                                
                                    of Measures
                                
                                    Validity 
                                
                                    of Measures
                                
                                    Fidelity
                                 
                                
                                    Missing 
                                
                                    Data/Attrition
                                
                                    Confounding 
                                
                                    Variables
                                
                                    Data 
                                
                                    Analysis
                                
                                    Overall 
                            
                                    Rating
                                
                                         
                                    
                                            1: Substance use
                                         
                                        
                                            3.9
                                         
                                        
                                            3.9
                                         
                                        
                                            3.0
                                         
                                        
                                            2.6
                                         
                                        
                                            1.2
                                         
                                        
                                            1.2
                                         
                                        
                                            
                                                2.6
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            2: Global clinical improvement
                                         
                                        
                                            3.3
                                         
                                        
                                            3.3
                                         
                                        
                                            2.5
                                         
                                        
                                            3.3
                                         
                                        
                                            1.2
                                         
                                        
                                            1.2
                                         
                                        
                                            
                                                2.4
                                         
                                    
                                         
                                    
                                            3: Impulsive and addictive behavior
                                         
                                        
                                            3.0
                                         
                                        
                                            2.5
                                         
                                        
                                            2.5
                                         
                                        
                                            3.3
                                         
                                        
                                            1.2
                                         
                                        
                                            1.2
                                         
                                        
                                            
                                                2.3
                                         
                                    
                                         
                        
                                            4: Knowledge of workbook concepts
                                         
                                        
                                            1.0
                                         
                                        
                                            1.8
                                         
                                        
                                            2.5
                                         
                                        
                                            3.3
                                         
                                        
                                            1.2
                                         
                                        
                                            1.2
                                         
                                        
                                            
                                                1.8
                                         
                                    Study Strengths 
Study Weaknesses 
     
                     
        
                 
            
                    
                                Materials Reviewed
                            
                                    Readiness for Dissemination Ratings by Criteria (0.0-4.0 scale)
                                
                                    
                                    
                            
                                         
                                            
                                            Implementation
                                             
                                        
                                            Materials
                                        
                                            Training and Support
                                             
                                        
                                            Resources
                                        
                                            Quality Assurance
                                             
                                        
                                            Procedures
                                        
                                            Overall
                                             
                                    
                                            Rating
                                        
                                                 
                                
                                                    1.5
                                                 
                                                
                                                    1.5
                                                 
                                                
                                                    2.0
                                                 
                                                
                                                
                                                    1.7
                                                 
                                            Dissemination Strengths 
 Dissemination Weaknesses 
 
     
                
           
                     
                        
                        Item Description
                     
                    
                        Cost
                     
                    
                        Required by Developer
                     
                
                             
                        
                                A Woman's Addiction Notebook: Your Guide to In-Depth Healing
                             
                            
                                $22 each, one per participant
                             
                            
                                Yes
                             
                        
                             
                        
                                1-day clinician training provided on site or by phone
                             
                            
                                About $1,600 per day plus travel expenses if applicable
                             
                            
                                No
                             
                        
                             
            
                                Phone consultation
                             
                            
                                About $115 per hour
                             
                            
                                No